<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lut on Film</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bertstephani.com/2010/01/15/lut-on-film/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bertstephani.com/2010/01/15/lut-on-film/</link>
	<description>with Bert Stephani</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:48:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: min</title>
		<link>http://bertstephani.com/2010/01/15/lut-on-film/comment-page-1/#comment-11751</link>
		<dc:creator>min</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bertstephani.com/?p=603#comment-11751</guid>
		<description>hey Bert, nice film photos! film is just awesome!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Bert, nice film photos! film is just awesome!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert Stephani</title>
		<link>http://bertstephani.com/2010/01/15/lut-on-film/comment-page-1/#comment-11708</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert Stephani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bertstephani.com/?p=603#comment-11708</guid>
		<description>@Wilhelm: I played around with over exposing the film a bit (too much). And I learned that shooting film with studioflash isn&#039;t the same as with natural light. With continuous light, I&#039;m starting to be able to predict how it will look but I&#039;ll need lots of testrolls before I can do the same with flash. I just feel that they could be a lot better with some more experience and practice. 

@Glen: I think (don&#039;t have the negatives here) most of them are shot on HP5 plus and maybe one or two on Porta 400NC and converted to BW (because I really didn&#039;t like the color.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Wilhelm: I played around with over exposing the film a bit (too much). And I learned that shooting film with studioflash isn&#8217;t the same as with natural light. With continuous light, I&#8217;m starting to be able to predict how it will look but I&#8217;ll need lots of testrolls before I can do the same with flash. I just feel that they could be a lot better with some more experience and practice. </p>
<p>@Glen: I think (don&#8217;t have the negatives here) most of them are shot on HP5 plus and maybe one or two on Porta 400NC and converted to BW (because I really didn&#8217;t like the color.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GLEN SCOLAN</title>
		<link>http://bertstephani.com/2010/01/15/lut-on-film/comment-page-1/#comment-11707</link>
		<dc:creator>GLEN SCOLAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bertstephani.com/?p=603#comment-11707</guid>
		<description>Which kind of rolls of film did you use ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which kind of rolls of film did you use ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilhelm</title>
		<link>http://bertstephani.com/2010/01/15/lut-on-film/comment-page-1/#comment-11706</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilhelm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bertstephani.com/?p=603#comment-11706</guid>
		<description>Bert,

I think they look good though maybe a bit on the hot side. Number 1 is really nice with that framing. Number 2 and 4 look a bit dull in the tones and number 3 is very nice though I would probably have put a bit less light on her face. I do think the tones look much better compared to the digi. What don&#039;t you like about them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bert,</p>
<p>I think they look good though maybe a bit on the hot side. Number 1 is really nice with that framing. Number 2 and 4 look a bit dull in the tones and number 3 is very nice though I would probably have put a bit less light on her face. I do think the tones look much better compared to the digi. What don&#8217;t you like about them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

